# Les 17: Eindproject Polish & Code Review

---

## Hoofdstuk
**Deel 4: Advanced AI & Deployment** (Les 13-18)

## Beschrijving
Finale polish fase van je eindproject. Focus op code review, peer feedback, en laatste verbeteringen voor inlevering. Voorbereiding op presentatie.

---

## Te Behandelen

### Groepsdiscussie (15 min)
Bespreek klassikaal de werkdag voortgang uit Les 16 - wat hebben jullie afgekregen, wat bleek moeilijker dan verwacht?

### Code Review Checklist

**TypeScript & Code Quality:**
- [ ] No TypeScript errors
- [ ] No `any` types
- [ ] Props properly typed
- [ ] Error handling complete
- [ ] No console.logs in production

**React Best Practices:**
- [ ] No unnecessary re-renders
- [ ] Keys properly set in lists
- [ ] Hooks rules followed
- [ ] Components split logically
- [ ] Prop drilling minimized

**Styling & UX:**
- [ ] Responsive design working
- [ ] Mobile friendly
- [ ] Consistent styling
- [ ] Accessible (alt text, labels, etc.)
- [ ] No visual bugs

**Performance:**
- [ ] Lighthouse > 80
- [ ] Lazy load images
- [ ] Optimize bundles
- [ ] Fast interactions
- [ ] Minimal flickering

---

### Peer Review Process

**Hoe peer review doen:**

1. **Voorbereiding (10 min)**
   - Share productie URL of GitHub link
   - List main features
   - Highlight AI features

2. **Review (15 min)**
   - Reviewer tests alle features
   - Takes notes
   - Looks at code (if applicable)

3. **Feedback (10 min)**
   - ✅ Wat werkt goed
   - ⚠️ What could improve
   - ❌ Any bugs found

4. **Discussion (5 min)**
   - Q&A
   - Discuss suggestions
   - Agree on priorities

---

### Final Checklist for Submission

**Functionality:**
- [ ] All features work in production
- [ ] Auth flows complete
- [ ] CRUD operations complete
- [ ] AI feature functional
- [ ] No console errors

**Documentation:**
- [ ] README.md complete
- [ ] PROMPT-LOG.md has 10+ entries
- [ ] AI-DECISIONS.md has 5+ entries
- [ ] .env.example up to date
- [ ] Setup instructions clear

**Code Quality:**
- [ ] Code is clean and organized
- [ ] Comments where needed
- [ ] Consistent naming
- [ ] No dead code
- [ ] .cursorrules present

**Performance & UX:**
- [ ] Lighthouse score > 80
- [ ] Loading states visible
- [ ] Error states handled
- [ ] Mobile responsive
- [ ] Fast load times

**Deployment:**
- [ ] Deployed on Vercel
- [ ] Working on production URL
- [ ] Supabase configured
- [ ] Environment variables secure
- [ ] No errors in production

---

## Tools
- GitHub
- Vercel
- Chrome DevTools
- Cursor
- Peer reviewers

---

## Lesopdracht (3 uur)

### Code Review & Polish Session

**Deel 1: Peer Review (1 uur)**

Work in pairs or small groups:
1. Exchange project URLs/repos
2. Each person reviews another's work
3. Take detailed notes
4. Provide constructive feedback
5. Discuss improvements

**Deel 2: Final Polish (1.5 uur)**

Based on feedback:
1. Fix identified bugs
2. Implement suggested improvements
3. Code cleanup
4. Update documentation
5. Final test in production

**Deel 3: Final Checks (30 min)**

Go through the submission checklist:
1. Verify all items are done
2. Test everything once more
3. Make final commits
4. Push to GitHub
5. Screenshot for documentation

### Deliverable
- Peer review feedback received
- All feedback items addressed
- Final production-ready code
- Complete documentation
- Screenshot of final app

---

## Huiswerk

**Final submission preparation:**

1. **Complete ALL documentation:**
   - README with features and setup
   - PROMPT-LOG.md with 10+ prompts
   - AI-DECISIONS.md with 5+ decisions
   - Project state documented

2. **Final testing:**
   - Test all features in production
   - Check Lighthouse score
   - Verify mobile responsiveness
   - Check load times

3. **Code review:**
   - Ask classmates to review code
   - Ask docent for feedback
   - Fix any issues found
   - Final cleanup

4. **Prepare for submission:**
   - Ensure Git history is clean
   - All commits have good messages
   - GitHub repo is public/accessible
   - Production URL is stable

### Deliverable
- Final, polished application
- All documentation complete
- Code review completed
- Ready for submission

---

## Leerdoelen
Na deze les kan de student:
- Code review uitvoeren volgens best practices
- Peer feedback ontvangen en implementeren
- Final polish toepassen op projecten
- Production checklist doorlopen
- Professional quality deliverables opleveren
- Zelfstandig werk evalueren en verbeteren
