Files
novi-lessons/Samenvattingen/Les17-Samenvatting.md
2026-03-11 14:07:00 +01:00

208 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown

# Les 17: Eindproject Polish & Code Review
---
## Hoofdstuk
**Deel 4: Advanced AI & Deployment** (Les 13-18)
## Beschrijving
Finale polish fase van je eindproject. Focus op code review, peer feedback, en laatste verbeteringen voor inlevering. Voorbereiding op presentatie.
---
## Te Behandelen
### Groepsdiscussie (15 min)
Bespreek klassikaal de werkdag voortgang uit Les 16 - wat hebben jullie afgekregen, wat bleek moeilijker dan verwacht?
### Code Review Checklist
**TypeScript & Code Quality:**
- [ ] No TypeScript errors
- [ ] No `any` types
- [ ] Props properly typed
- [ ] Error handling complete
- [ ] No console.logs in production
**React Best Practices:**
- [ ] No unnecessary re-renders
- [ ] Keys properly set in lists
- [ ] Hooks rules followed
- [ ] Components split logically
- [ ] Prop drilling minimized
**Styling & UX:**
- [ ] Responsive design working
- [ ] Mobile friendly
- [ ] Consistent styling
- [ ] Accessible (alt text, labels, etc.)
- [ ] No visual bugs
**Performance:**
- [ ] Lighthouse > 80
- [ ] Lazy load images
- [ ] Optimize bundles
- [ ] Fast interactions
- [ ] Minimal flickering
---
### Peer Review Process
**Hoe peer review doen:**
1. **Voorbereiding (10 min)**
- Share productie URL of GitHub link
- List main features
- Highlight AI features
2. **Review (15 min)**
- Reviewer tests alle features
- Takes notes
- Looks at code (if applicable)
3. **Feedback (10 min)**
- ✅ Wat werkt goed
- ⚠️ What could improve
- ❌ Any bugs found
4. **Discussion (5 min)**
- Q&A
- Discuss suggestions
- Agree on priorities
---
### Final Checklist for Submission
**Functionality:**
- [ ] All features work in production
- [ ] Auth flows complete
- [ ] CRUD operations complete
- [ ] AI feature functional
- [ ] No console errors
**Documentation:**
- [ ] README.md complete
- [ ] PROMPT-LOG.md has 10+ entries
- [ ] AI-DECISIONS.md has 5+ entries
- [ ] .env.example up to date
- [ ] Setup instructions clear
**Code Quality:**
- [ ] Code is clean and organized
- [ ] Comments where needed
- [ ] Consistent naming
- [ ] No dead code
- [ ] .cursorrules present
**Performance & UX:**
- [ ] Lighthouse score > 80
- [ ] Loading states visible
- [ ] Error states handled
- [ ] Mobile responsive
- [ ] Fast load times
**Deployment:**
- [ ] Deployed on Vercel
- [ ] Working on production URL
- [ ] Supabase configured
- [ ] Environment variables secure
- [ ] No errors in production
---
## Tools
- GitHub
- Vercel
- Chrome DevTools
- Cursor
- Peer reviewers
---
## Lesopdracht (3 uur)
### Code Review & Polish Session
**Deel 1: Peer Review (1 uur)**
Work in pairs or small groups:
1. Exchange project URLs/repos
2. Each person reviews another's work
3. Take detailed notes
4. Provide constructive feedback
5. Discuss improvements
**Deel 2: Final Polish (1.5 uur)**
Based on feedback:
1. Fix identified bugs
2. Implement suggested improvements
3. Code cleanup
4. Update documentation
5. Final test in production
**Deel 3: Final Checks (30 min)**
Go through the submission checklist:
1. Verify all items are done
2. Test everything once more
3. Make final commits
4. Push to GitHub
5. Screenshot for documentation
### Deliverable
- Peer review feedback received
- All feedback items addressed
- Final production-ready code
- Complete documentation
- Screenshot of final app
---
## Huiswerk
**Final submission preparation:**
1. **Complete ALL documentation:**
- README with features and setup
- PROMPT-LOG.md with 10+ prompts
- AI-DECISIONS.md with 5+ decisions
- Project state documented
2. **Final testing:**
- Test all features in production
- Check Lighthouse score
- Verify mobile responsiveness
- Check load times
3. **Code review:**
- Ask classmates to review code
- Ask docent for feedback
- Fix any issues found
- Final cleanup
4. **Prepare for submission:**
- Ensure Git history is clean
- All commits have good messages
- GitHub repo is public/accessible
- Production URL is stable
### Deliverable
- Final, polished application
- All documentation complete
- Code review completed
- Ready for submission
---
## Leerdoelen
Na deze les kan de student:
- Code review uitvoeren volgens best practices
- Peer feedback ontvangen en implementeren
- Final polish toepassen op projecten
- Production checklist doorlopen
- Professional quality deliverables opleveren
- Zelfstandig werk evalueren en verbeteren